Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0971

reference
428-tree-1
name
0971
tree-preservation-order

undefined

428-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.035727 50.895815)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.035627 50.895804,-1.035632 50.895824,-1.035646 50.895842,-1.035667 50.895856,-1.035695 50.895865,-1.035726 50.895868,-1.035757 50.895865,-1.035784 50.895857,-1.035807 50.895843,-1.035821 50.895825,-1.035827 50.895806,-1.035822 50.895787,-1.035808 50.895769,-1.035787 50.895755,-1.035759 50.895746,-1.035728 50.895742,-1.035697 50.895745,-1.035670 50.895754,-1.035647 50.895768,-1.035633 50.895785,-1.035627 50.895804)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL